[1]李魁明,姚罗兰,张达,等.京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区的空间格局及其影响因素[J].自然灾害学报,2022,31(05):024-30.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0503]
 LI Kuiming,YAO Luolan,ZHANG Da,et al.Spatial pattern and influencing factors of comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration community in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J].,2022,31(05):024-30.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0503]
点击复制

京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区的空间格局及其影响因素
分享到:

《自然灾害学报》[ISSN:/CN:23-1324/X]

卷:
31
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
024-30
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial pattern and influencing factors of comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration community in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
作者:
李魁明12 姚罗兰3 张达1 刘溪辰1 韩默1
1. 防灾科技学院 应急管理学院, 河北 三河 065201;
2. 首都师范大学 资源环境与旅游学院, 北京 100048;
3. 北京农业职业学院 国际教育学院, 北京 100012
Author(s):
LI Kuiming12 YAO Luolan3 ZHANG Da1 LIU Xichen1 HAN Mo1
1. College of Emergency Management, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe 065201, China;
2. College of Resources, Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
3. International Education College, Beijing Agricultural Vocational College, Beijing 100012, China
关键词:
综合减灾示范社区空间格局影响因素京津冀地区地理探测器
Keywords:
comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration communitiesspatial patterninfluencing factorsBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei regiongeodetector analysis
分类号:
D632.5;X43
DOI:
10.13577/j.jnd.2022.0503
摘要:
为厘清京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区空间格局,优化地区防灾和减灾资源基础设施建设,以京津冀地区1 275个综合减灾示范社区为研究对象,运用空间分析和计量方法,对京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区的空间格局及其影响因素进行研究。结果表明:京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区呈集聚型分布,空间分布极不均衡,差异较大,从市域尺度看,主要集中在北京市、天津市和石家庄市;从地理区域来看,主要分布在京津地区、冀中地区等区域;核密度分析显示京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区存在明显的区域差异,在空间分布上有3个高密度地区,其中以北京市中心城区一带最为明显;综合减灾示范社区空间分布的全局莫兰指数表明存在显著的空间正相关性;地理探测器分析表明,京津冀地区综合减灾示范社区空间格局主要受到经济因素和人口因素影响,受政策因素和灾害风险因素影响较小。
Abstract:
In order to find out the spatial pattern of the demonstration communities of comprehensive disaster reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and optimize the construction of the regional infrastructure of disaster prevention and reduction resources,a total of 1 275 demonstration communities for comprehensive disaster reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region were selected as research objects,using spatial analysis and measurement methods, and the spatial pattern and its influencing factors of the demonstration community of comprehensive disaster reduction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region were studied. The results show that the model communities of comprehensive disaster reduction in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are clustered,with uneven spatial distribution and large spatial differences. From the perspective of the city scale,it is mainly distributed in Beijing,Tianjin and Shijiazhuang. In terms of geographical area,it is mainly distributed in Beijing-Tianjin area and the central part of Hebei Province. The nuclear density analysis shows that there are obvious regional differences in the demonstration communities of comprehensive disaster reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area,there are three high density areas in the spatial distribution, especially in the central area of Beijing. The Global Moran index of the spatial distribution of the comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration community showed that there was a significant positive spatial correlation. And the geographical detector analysis shows that the spatial pattern of the demonstration communities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is mainly affected by economic and population, but less by policy and disaster risk.

参考文献/References:

[1] 毛小苓,倪晋仁,张菲菲,等. 面向社区的全过程风险管理模型的理论和应用[J]. 自然灾害学报,2006,15(1):23-28. MAO Xiaoling,NI Jinren,ZHANG Feifei,et al. Theory and application of COPRMS model for risk management[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2006,15(1):23-28.(in Chinese)
[2] 王东明,施唯,张丽. 我国城市地震安全示范社区创建现状与未来发展设想[J]. 自然灾害学报,2019,28(3):195-204. WANG Dongming,SHI Wei,ZHANG Li. Present situation and future conception of the national earthquake safety demonstration communities in urban areas in China[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2019,28(3):195-204.(in Chinese)
[3] 周洪建.当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J].地球科学进展, 2017, 32(7):688-695. ZHOU Hongjian.Hottopics and prospects of global platform for disaster risk reduction:Based on 2017 global platform for disaster risk reduction in Cancun, Mexico[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(7):688-695.(in Chinese)
[4] 唐桂娟. 治理理论视阈下中美社区减灾模式比较及启示[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(1):90-96. TANG Guijuan. Comparison of SinoUS community disaster mitigation and enlightment from the perspective of governing theory[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2017,19(1):90-96.(in Chinese)
[5] 俸锡金. 社区综合减灾示范模式的特征和影响分析[J]. 中国减灾,2017(7):10-15. FENG Xijin. Characteristics and impact analysis of community comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration model[J]. Disaster Reduction in China,2017(7):10-15.(in Chinese)
[6] 吴竞妍,倪维,杨赛霓. 中国综合减灾示范社区的发展演变与创建成效评价[J]. 灾害学,2019,34(3):184-188. WU Jingyan,NI Wei,YANG Saini. The development and effectiveness assessment of comprehensive disaster reduction demonstration community in China[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,2019,34(3):184-188.(in Chinese)
[7] 扈海波,李京校. 雷电灾害风险评估模型在社区空间尺度上对雷击危险次数及脆弱性的模拟和分析[J]. 自然灾害学报,2015,24(1):191-202. HU Haibo,LI Jingxiao. Simulation and analysis of number of dangerous lightning events and vulnerability on a scale of community:application of lightning disaster evaluation model[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2015,24(1):191-202.(in Chinese)
[8] 张振国,温家洪,李雪丽. 面向社区的参与式灾害风险评估模型研究[J]. 灾害学,2013,28(3):142-146. ZHANG Zhenguo,WEN Jiahong,LI Xueli. Research on communitybased participatory disaster risk assessment model[J]. Journal of Catastrophology,2013,28(3):142-146.(in Chinese)
[9] 刘羿滢,刘旭锋,肖璐,等. 基于心理距离的社区内涝风险感知差异性分析[J]. 防灾科技学院学报,2021,23(2):70-78. LIU Yiying,LIU Xufeng,XIAO Lu,et al. Analysis of the differences in community waterlogging risk perception based on psychological distance[J]. Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention,2021,23(2):70-78.(in Chinese)
[10] 杜金莹,唐晓春,徐建刚. 热带气旋灾害影响下的城市韧性提升紧迫度评估研究:以珠江三角洲地区的城市为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2020,29(5):88-98. DU Jinying,TANG Xiaochun,XU Jiangang. Study on urgency assessment of urban resilience promotion:A case study of typhoon disasters in the Pearl River Delta region[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2020,29(5):88-98.(in Chinese)
[11] 张佰尚,范刚龙,唐攀,等. 社区应急疏散动态协作调度优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2019,27(4):190-197. ZHANG Baishang,FAN Ganglong,TANG Pan,et al. Research on the dynamic collaborative scheduling optimization for community evacuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(4):190-197.(in Chinese)
[12] 郭永锐,张捷,张玉玲. 旅游目的地社区恢复力的影响因素及其作用机制[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(1):133-144. GUO Yongrui,ZHANG Jie,ZHANG Yuling. Influencing factors and mechanism of community resilience in tourism destinations[J]. Geographical Research,2018,37(1):133-144.(in Chinese)
[13] 卢松, 张小军, 张业臣.徽州传统村落的时空分布及其影响因素[J].地理科学, 2018, 38(10):1690-1698. LU Song, ZHANG Xiaojun, ZHANG Yechen. Spatialtemporal distribution and controlling factors of traditional villages in Huizhou region[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(10):1690-1698.(in Chinese)
[14] 金江磊, 闫浩文, 杨树文, 等.甘肃省传统村落的空间分异格局研究[J].测绘科学, 2018, 43(12):28-33. JIN Jianglei, YAN Haowen, YANG Shuwen, et al. Research on the spatial differentiation pattern of traditional villages in Gansu province[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2018, 43(12):28-33.(in Chinese)
[15] 岳菊, 戴湘毅.京津冀文化遗产时空格局及其影响因素——以文物保护单位为例[J].经济地理, 2020, 40(12):221-230. YUE Ju, DAI Xiangyi.Temporal and spatial pattern of cultural heritage in BeijingTianjinHebei Region and its influencing factors:A case study of cultural relic protection unit[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(12):221-230.(in Chinese)
[16] 吴必虎,唐子颖. 旅游吸引物空间结构分析:以中国首批国家4A级旅游区(点)为例[J]. 人文地理,2003,18(1):1-5,28. WU Bihu,TANG Ziying. A study on spatial structure of national 4A grade tourism attractions in China[J]. Human Geography,2003,18(1):1-5,28.(in Chinese)
[17] 李伯华,尹莎,刘沛林,等. 湖南省传统村落空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 经济地理,2015,35(2):189-194. LI Bohua,YIN Sha,LIU Peilin,et al. Spatial distribution of traditional villages and the influencing factors in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography,2015,35(2):189-194.(in Chinese)
[18] 马林兵, 魏慧丽, 曹小曙.基于FCD数据的城市有效路网密度评价——以广州荔湾区和越秀区为例[J].地理研究, 2015, 34(03):541-554. MA Linbing, WEI Huili, CAO Xiaoshu. Evaluating the valid density of road network in urban based on FCD:case of Liwan and Yuexiu district in Guangzhou city[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3):541-554.(in Chinese)
[19] 陶雨婷, 吴云清.基于Moran’ I指数的全国空气质量时空格局分析[J].自然灾害学报, 2018, 27(5):107-113. TAO Yuting, WU Yunqing. Spatial and temporal pattern analysis of national air quality based on Moran’s I Index[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2018, 27(5):107-113.(in Chinese)
[20] 王劲峰,徐成东. 地理探测器:原理与展望[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134. WANG Jinfeng,XU Chengdong. Geodetector:principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2017,72(1):116-134.(in Chinese)
[21] 李博,杨波,陶前辉,等. 湖南省传统村落空间格局及其影响因素研究[J]. 测绘科学,2021,46(4):150-157. LI Bo,YANG Bo,TAO Qianhui,et al. Study on spatial pattern and influencing factors of traditional villages in Hunan Province[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping,2021,46(4):150-157.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]郭红,龚文峰,孔达.基于DEM的帽儿山地区土壤侵蚀定量分析[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(03):139.
 GUO Hong,GONG Wen-feng,KONG Da.DEM-based quantitative analysis of soil erosion——a case study of Maoershan region[J].,2009,18(05):139.
[2]程先富,王诗晨,路明浩,等.安徽沿江地区洪涝灾害风险的空间格局演变[J].自然灾害学报,2014,23(02):129.[doi:1004-4574(2014)02-0129-08]
 CHENG Xianfu,WANG Shichen,LU Minghao,et al.Spatial-temporal change of flood disaster risk of area along the Yangtze River in Anhui Province[J].,2014,23(05):129.[doi:1004-4574(2014)02-0129-08]
[3]王瑛,刘天雪,李体上,等.中国中小型自然灾害的空间格局研究——以地震、洪涝、旱灾为例[J].自然灾害学报,2017,26(04):048.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2017.0406]
 WANG Ying,LIU Tianxue,LI Tishang,et al.Study on spatial pattern of small and medium sized natural disasters in China:a case of earthquake, flood and drought[J].,2017,26(05):048.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2017.0406]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-9-15;改回日期:2021-12-24。
基金项目:河北省高等学校科学研究计划(SQ2021185)
作者简介:李魁明(1989-),男,博士研究生,主要从事防灾减灾规划与生态安全评价研究.E-mail:809927535@qq.com
通讯作者:张达(1980-),男,副教授,博士研究生,主要从事灾害地理学研究.E-mail:zhangda0167@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01